The issue of horse slaughter is on my mind today after reading a news story about the introduction of a U.S. Senate bill proposing the recommencement of horse meat inspection funding. That's when I poked around on the Internet a bit and found the "Haters List".
In case you haven't seen it, the blog Wild Horse Haters & Horse Slaughter Promoters published a lengthy list of horse hatin’ people and groups (i.e. opponents of the horse slaughter ban in the U.S., according to the blog's publishers) so that the public can boycott them, their members, and their services.
A link to the Haters List can be found here. The Haters List includes the American Association of Equine Practitioners (AAEP) and just about every major U.S. horse association, cattle association, and farm association.
Note: the publisher(s) of the Haters List and the blog on which is appears remain(s) anonymous.
I am a life member of two associations on the Haters List: the American Paint Horse Association and the American Quarter Horse Association. What about you?
Milt Toby, a colleague of mine in Kentucky, did a blog post a while ago about how the issue of horse slaughter has a way of dividing people. But can we draw general lines to determine who, in general, is in favor of laws allowing for the processing of horse meat in the U.S. versus who is against such laws?
Upon review of the Haters List, it would seem to me that in general, those who support humane horse processing in the United States are those who, either directly or indirectly, are in the horse business. This includes the AAEP, a national group of equine veterinarians whose mission includes "meticulous concern for the health and welfare of the horse".
There are of course others who support horse processing in the U.S. who aren’t directly or indirectly in the horse business. One example is Fort Worth Star Telegram journalist Bob Ray Sanders. Mr. Sanders’s recent editorial entitled “Congress Should Revisit Ban on Horse Slaughter” cites evidence from the recent Government Accountability Office report.
And surely there are some in the “horse business” who are in favor of government bans on processing horse meat in the U.S.
But assuming the Haters List is correct, it tells us a lot about where the “line in the sand” is drawn. The Haters List seems to indicate that, in general, most horse businesses and equine veterinarians are in favor of humane horse processing in the United States. Do you agree with this assessment?
While you ponder this poignant question, I’ll leave you with a quote from Milt Toby’s blog this week:
I think the world would be a better place if horses were not being slaughtered for food anywhere. I think the same thing about cows and pigs and sheep and chickens and tuna and salmon, and I think it’s logically and morally inconsistent to categorically oppose one without opposing all. And no, I’m not a vegan."
Follow me on Twitter @alisonmrowe
**19 SEP 2011 Clarification: Out of all of my readers, only two individuals read this post and thought that I agreed with the publishers of the "Haters List" and that I don't believe that any animals should be processed for meat. Although most people "got" where I was coming from on this issue, this alterted me to the fact that I may need to clarify some things. I was "poking fun", tongue in cheek, at the anonymous publishers of the "Haters List" because I feel that their methods greatly reduce their credibility. I was also asking if anyone agreed with me that it seems that most equine vets and most people who are in the horse business support humane processing. As far as Milt Toby's quote goes, I read it as saying that Milt believes you can't categorically oppose humane horse slaughter unless you also oppose the humane slaughter of other animals.**